Saturday, May 12, 2012

COPYRIGHT

The word copyright is a confusing word for many people in the world. In April 1989, US dropped the requirement for a copyright notice to have copyright protection. Items prior to April of 1989 without a copyright notice lost protection but it still the area of Copyright is a gray one.
The Copyright Ordinance 1962 governed copyright law in Pakistan. Significant changes were made through the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1992 and the Copyright (Amendment) Ordinance 2000, whereby, Copyright protection originally available to literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, cinematographic and architectural works, books, photographs, newspapers, engravings, lectures, and sculptures was extended to include computer software, periodicals, video films and all forms of audio-visual work.
The copyright law protects literary works, including works on humanity, religion, social and physical sciences, tables, compilation of data, computer programs and artistic work, including phonograms, and contains penalties for copyright violations. These rights extend for 50 years from the year of creation or performance. Provisions of the copyright law consists of the permissions which the government grants in the form of a license to reprint, translate, adapt or publish any text or book, any video or movie on a non- profit basis in the public interest.

Review on ---- Pakistan - A Love Story


Review on ---- Pakistan - A Love Story

Written and Produced by Owais Moeen
Directed by Zubair Siddiqi

A documentary by ‘alienation’ showed that their work was about love stories people want to see on television, but when it comes to our society, then it is a taboo issue altogether. We have Karo Kari and forced marriages in our less-educated or illiterate parts of the society. But what is the impact of these love stories on our evolving society - Positive or Negative?

This was a class project of Iobm students solely prepares to create awareness of Media Ethics.

Review


This documentry began with a song by Strings, Kahani Mohabbat ki hay mukhtasir, which gave them the element to attract the attention of the audience.
According to the view point shown through this documentary, they wanted to make people aware that it is the media which is influencing our society in doing such acts which leads to Karo Kari. And the fact that girls get married against their wishes only because the groom’s family want dowry in return. We do not know the reason why this happens, and why girls get killed because they brought less dowry with them or they belonged to a lower class family as compared to their in-laws.
Most girls are divorced and the rationale given is that she has a bad character or that she was fostering relations with other men, and doing all behind the back of her husband. But the real issue is always dowry
This does happen in our society, but it is our media which plays a vital role in spreading such news and information to the masses, which is not ethical. As private channels grew, they used sensationalism to increase their ratings and viewership, and to do that they started airing news related to sex, rape cases, Karo Kari, girls getting humiliated and even murdered by their in-laws and families.
In this documentary, they also showed the hidden videos of couples belonging to mediocre families, who are indulged in doing oral sex. But here comes the biasness on the side of the group who made this documentary. Such vulgar acts between people of the opposite sex are also a normal act in the upper and upper-middle class families, where “everything” happens in dance parties. Even some people belonging to the middle class family also do such acts but no one highlights them.  
In my opinion, the path chosen by the members of this group who made the documentary was clear. But the videos they showed were not appropriate. Not because they were vulgar, but because if they have shown people from the lower class doing oral sex, then vides of people from the upper and upper-middle class doing the same vulgar acts must have shown. This would have given a balanced picture of our society, that both the lower and upper class is having fun and doing unethical acts, which are morally unacceptable in our society.
Whatever they showed in their video is also not appropriate. Such issues of taboo nature are dealt with delicacy. If they had to discuss such a topic, then some other means should have been followed to explain their point. One more thing that I noticed was the imbalanced nature of interviews and videos. The interviews taken were from a different class and the videos of people making out were from a different social class altogether.  It must have been a documentary showing interviews of a certain class of people and the people from the same class having a love affair. The members of this group have not justice with the documentary and the topic. By watching their video, one might have a perception that only the lower class is doing immoral activities. But the truth is, every social class is being entertained by such immoral acts. Some get propagated, others remain confined behind curtains. 

Friday, April 27, 2012

PEMRA ORDINANCE

PEMRA (Pakistan Electronic Media Authority) established an ordinance in 2002, which is known as PEMRA ORDINANCE was implemented to monitor and facilitate private channels in Pakistan. It was important to regulate all private channels to improve the standard of educations, news, current affairs, entertainment, and science and technologies sectors. PEMRA does ensure about accountability, transparency and good governance by optimizing the free flow of information.

PEMRA doesn’t not only monitor electronic media but it also monitors FM RADIO, SATELITE TV, MMDS (Multichannel multipoint distribution service (MMDS) also known as wireless cable (wireless telecommunications technology) and many others.

PEMRA ORDINANCE 2002

In PEMRA ordinance 2002 PEMRA made some rules for all channels and services provider that how they should run their business and what will be the major responsibility of these channels PEMRA also set some rules which must be followed when channels run their content and flow chart. PEMRA also established some terms in their ordinance, which were mandatory to follow. Some of them are given below.

1-      Respects the sovereignty, security and integrity of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

2-      Respect the national, cultural, social and religious values and the principles of public policy as enshrined in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan;

3-      Ensure that programmers and advertisements do not encourage violence, terrorism, racial, ethnic or religious discrimination, sectarianism, extremism, militancy or hatred;

4-      Broadcast or distribute programmers in the public interest specified by the Federal Government or the Authority in the manner indicated by the Government or, as the case may be, the Authority, provided that the duration of such mandatory programmers do not exceed ten per cent of the total duration of broadcast or operation by a station in twenty-four hours except if, by its own volition, a station chooses to broadcast or distribute such content for a longer duration;

5-      Comply with the codes of programmers and advertisements approved by the Authority;

6-      Not broadcast or distribute any programmed or advertisement in violation of copyright or other property right;

After reviewing all these terms, do we think our news channels, entertainment channels and radio channels are following a single rule properly.

What are the reasons and who is behind all this nonsense? We don’t know but the only question is why PEMRA doesn’t take any action against such acts? Why Pakistani government is still quiet? Why this nonsense always makes us a foo? What is the objective and what will be the results?

Now I would say that the responsibility of bad image of Pakistani around the world is not only because of Media, but also because of the Government of Pakistan and PEMRA who is the regulating authority and controller of this nonsense.

Journalism VS Activism


Journalism VS Activism


Journalism is not a business but it is an important responsibility. Journalists in the form of reporters gather reports of events at the local, national and international levels. Reporter gathers information through resources, interviews and research. 

Journalists do not only find facts, but they also create an analysis of the news they cover which include news and speeches by notable people. In broadcast, freshly hired journalists also do pre-interviews and research for senior journalists. 

Journalists are mostly busy in finding breaking news, features stories, and enterprise or investigative stories but on the other hand, they also write editorial, columns reviews, and online journalism; a part of journalism which has spread with the advent of digital communication.

Online journalism is also growing day by day nowadays, as journalists mostly communicate with blogs and discussion boards for online media, for it is more powerful and time efficient, where journalists can express public views and highlight facts very easily.

Activists arise mostly from journalism. Activists are those who give their viewpoint on reporting, interviewing, research, columns & online journalism; they also cover hard news but some people say that activists are a paranoid form of journalism because activists always give their viewpoint on each news; and most of the time their point of view becomes biased and terrified. Activists gain popularity among general public because they always say what people want to hear. Activists rule in the mind of the general public.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Muhammad Raheel

Dear Students,

Its me Muhammad Raheel Rauf from intro to web class.

Regards